Los Angeles Claims Adjuster Property and Causality Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Study for the Los Angeles Claims Adjuster Exam. Prepare with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Get ready to succeed!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What must products coverage legal responsibility be based on?

  1. Product availability

  2. Customer satisfaction

  3. Breach of Warranty, Strict Liability, or Negligence

  4. Market conditions

The correct answer is: Breach of Warranty, Strict Liability, or Negligence

Products coverage legal responsibility is grounded in the legal concepts of breach of warranty, strict liability, or negligence. This framework establishes how manufacturers, distributors, and retailers are held accountable for the safety and effectiveness of the products they offer. Breach of warranty refers to a violation of the promises or guarantees made about the product, whether expressed or implied. Strict liability holds a party responsible for their actions or products without the need to prove negligence or fault. This means that if a product is defective and causes harm, the manufacturer can be liable regardless of their intent or care in creating the product. Negligence pertains to a failure to act with reasonable care, which can lead to harm or injury from a product. These principles ensure that there is a legal recourse for consumers who are harmed by defective or unsafe products, thereby protecting public health and safety. The other options, such as product availability, customer satisfaction, or market conditions, do not encompass the nuanced legal responsibilities that producers bear concerning the products they manufacture and sell.